ASPECTOS TOMOGRÁFICOS PELO FEIXE CÔNICO DOS TERCEIROS MOLARES COM ANQUILOSE
Resumo
Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
18Referências
de Oliveira FT, Capelozza ALA, Lauris JRP, de Bullen IRFR. Mineralization of mandibular third molars can estimate chronological age—Brazilian indices. Forensic Sci Int. 2012;219:147-50.
Pedro FLM, Borges AH, Bandéca MC, Volpato LER, Marques ATC, Borba AM, et al. Prevalence of impacted teeth in a Brazilian subpopulation. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2014;15:209-13. doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1516.
Rege ICC. Anquilose dentária: desafios no diagnóstico utilizando exame de tomografia computadorizada de feixe cônico [dissertation]. Goiânia: Universidade Federal de Goiás; 2018 [cited 2024 Aug 30]. Available from: http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/8596
Maciel D, Rodrigues C, Martins C, Rodrigues L, Bueno MR, Estrela C. Spatial position and anatomical characteristics associated with impacted third molars using a map-reading strategy on cone-beam computed tomography scans: a retrospective analysis. Diagnostics (Basel). 2024;14:260. doi:10.3390/diagnostics14030260.
Leung YY, Hung KF, Tik D, Wai A. Application of cone beam computed tomography in risk assessment of lower third molar surgery. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023;13:919.
Consolaro A, Fernandes A, Consolaro R. Anquilose e reabsorção dentária por substituição não atrapalham a osseointegração dos implantes. Rev Dent Press Periodontia Implantol. 2010;4:29-37.
Wang D, Lin T, Wang Y, Sun C, Yang L, Jiang H, et al. Radiographic features of anatomic relationship between impacted third molar and inferior alveolar canal on coronal CBCT images: risk factors for nerve injury after tooth extraction. Arch Med Sci. 2018;14:532-40.
Martins LAC, Brasil DM, Freitas DQ, Oliveira ML. A novel method of objectively detecting tooth ankylosis using cone-beam computed tomography: a laboratory study. Imaging Sci Dent. 2023;53:61-7. doi:10.5624/isd.20220186.
Suter VGA, Rivola M, Schriber M, Leung YY, Bornstein MM. Risk factors for root resorption of second molars associated with impacted mandibular third molars. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;48:801-9. doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2018.11.005.
Oenning AC, Freire AR, Rossi AC, Prado FB, Correr-Sobrinho PL, et al. Resorptive potential of impacted mandibular third molars: 3D simulation by finite element analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2018;22:3195-203. doi:10.1007/s00784-018-2403-4.
Raimundo J, Leite S, Oliveira S. Evaluation of impacted lower third molars using cone beam computed tomography. J Dent. 2021;9:1-6.
Patel P, Shah J, Dudhia B, Butala P, Jani Y, Macwan R. Comparison of panoramic radiograph and cone beam computed tomography findings for impacted mandibular third molar root and inferior alveolar nerve canal relation. Indian J Dent Res. 2020;31:91. doi:10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_540_18.
Rege ICC, Botelho TL, Martins AFL, Leles CR, Mendonça EF. Pixel gray measurement for the diagnosis of dental ankylosis in cone beam computed tomography images. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2021;131:721-9.
Tassoker M. Diversion of the mandibular canal: is it the best predictor of inferior alveolar nerve damage during mandibular third molar surgery on panoramic radiographs? Imaging Sci Dent. 2019;49:213. doi:10.5624/isd.2019.49.3.213.
Telles-Araújo GT, Peralta-Mamani M, Caminha RDG, Moraes-da-Silva AF, Rubira CMF, Honório HM, et al. CBCT does not reduce neurosensory disturbances after third molar removal compared to panoramic radiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2020;24:1137-49. doi:10.1007/s00784-020-03231-6.
Apontamentos
- Não há apontamentos.
Indexadores:

